Group research can be both difficult and rewarding. Joining together with other people can mean you gain new perspectives and different skills from individuals, it also means more work can be done, due to sharing the workload. Our group began as three people, and gradually became 6 through the inclusion of new people, however after a few weeks of struggling to all find time to meet we decided to split in to two groups of three, meaning we would have a better chance of everyone being able to attend meetings.
This change in groups has meant we’ve had to reorganise ourselves. An important part of working in a group is organisation, as well as establishing shared goals and shared responsibility (Kouzes & Posner 2008). To establish our goal, we decided on a topic to base our research around, and we decided on abortion and religion. After some initial research we made the decision to narrow down our research to look at ‘In what way is Christianity still concerned with the issue of abortion in the UK and Ireland’, this allowed us to focus on one religion in a smaller geographical area. Beckman & Cook (2007) stated that establishing clear goals and refining the question were a key step to the planning process, and now that we have established our question, we can begin more in-depth research.
Meeting regularly to compare work is important in cohesive and productive group work (Huggett, et al., 2011), and is something that is now easier with the smaller group. As we are still in the researching phase we have yet to discuss roles or responsibilities, this may cause some disagreements as it can be difficult to separate responsibilities and workload equally. However, having only three people in the group should make it easier, although there may be more work to do. I hope that after we have brought together our independent research we can work as a team to make the poster and presentation, and therefore have an equal workload and commitment to the project.
Beckman T, Cook DA. 2007. Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers. Med Teach 29: 210–218.
Huggett, K., Gusic, M., Greenberg, R., Ketterer, J. Twelve tips for conducting collaborative research in medical education. Medical Teacher 33: 713-718
Kouzes JM, Posner BZ. 2008. The leadership challenge. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.